Contrast reduction and reading: assessment and reliability with the Reading Explorer test
Authors: Giacomelli G., Volpe R., Virgili G., Farini A., Arrighi R., Tarli-Barbieri C., Mencucci R., Menchini U.
Autors Affiliation: Department of Oto-Neuro-Ophthalmological Surgical Sciences, University of Firenze, Viale Morgagni, 85, 50134 Firenze, Italy; National Institute of Applied Optics, Firenze, Italy
Abstract: PURPOSE. To investigate the reliability of the Reading Explorer (REX) charts and to assess the impact of text contrast reduction (1.5 cycle/degree) on reading speed in subjects with normal and low vision. METHODS. Standard visual acuity (ETDRS charts), reading speed (MNread charts), and contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson charts) measurements were obtained in 3 groups of subjects stratified by visual acuity level in the better eye from 0.0 to 1.0 logMAR, with intermediate cutoffs at 0.3 and 0.6 logMAR. Measurements of reading speed for decreasing levels of text contrast were obtained with the REX charts using a 1.5 cycle/degree text.
RESULTS. Since in many patients with lower vision a plateau of maximum reading speed across different levels of text contrast was not found, reliability indexes were computed for average reading speed and reading contrast threshold. In the group with lower visual acuity, 95\% limits of agreement were +/- 0.134 log word/minute and +/- 0.175 log contrast
sensitivity, suggesting good reliability. The proportion of subjects with a 20\% loss of reading speed from 90\% to 45\% text contrast was estimated to be 1/3 at 0.6 logMAR visual acuity level and 2/3 at 1.0 logMAR.
CONCLUSIONS. The adverse effect of decreased text contrast, which may be found in ordinary reading material, on the reading performance of subjects with advanced and initial low vision is probably underestimated. The REX test proved to be a reliable investigation tool for this phenomenon.
Journal/Review: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume: 20 (2) Pages from: 389 to: 396
KeyWords: accuracy; adult; aged; article; contrast sensitivity; controlled study; functional assessment; human; logistic regression analysis; major clinical study; patient selection; perceptive threshold; priority journal; reading; reading explorer test; reliability; task performance; velocity; vision; visual acuity, Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Contrast Sensitivity; Humans; Middle Aged; Reading; Reproducibility of Results; ROC Curve; Vision Tests; Vision, Low; Young AdulCitations: 10data from “WEB OF SCIENCE” (of Thomson Reuters) are update at: 2020-09-13References taken from IsiWeb of Knowledge: (subscribers only)Connecting to view paper tab on IsiWeb: Click hereConnecting to view citations from IsiWeb: Click here